Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Brugge vs Amsterdam

Search

Brugge vs Amsterdam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4th, 2011, 01:18 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brugge vs Amsterdam

We (2 of us) did some pre-planning back in December for our upcoming trip to Europe ... and now are having a second look at those plans.

Our current plans are as follows:
Day1 - travel -- fly from western Canada to London; Eurostar to Brussels; arrive early evening (good likelihood we'll be exhausted from the day of travel);
Day 2 - Brussels - day to look at the city sights;
Day 3 - Brussels - day trip to Brugge;
Day 4 - Brussels to Amsterdam by train mid morning; afternoon/evening in Amsterdam;
Day 5 - morning/afternoon in Amsterdam; early evening train to Brussels;
Day 6 - morning train to London.

We are locked in with our Eurostar tickets; all hotels can be cancelled.

Questions .... have we allotted enough time to the different spots? should we spend Day 3 in Brussels and then Day 4/5 in Brugge instead of Amsterdam? is this itinerary to busy ... to much time travel time?

We like to get a a good overview of the city sights and prefer to take some time to 'smell the roses' and not make it a track meet!
Enroh is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2011, 01:36 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 26,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I loved Brussels and wasn't that interested in Brugges. It was okay, cute quaint little historic town. You didn't leave much time for Amsterdam.

Why not? What are your interests? Both Amsterdam and Brussels have great art museums.
LSky is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2011, 02:14 PM
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are more interested in looking at the sights and taking in the local ambiance.

How long did you spend in Brussels, Brugges and Amsterdam?
Enroh is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2011, 02:33 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We went to both Brugge and Amsterdam last year and loved both, but they are very different places. We ended up spending 1.5 days in Brugge and 5.5 days in Amsterdam, and wished we had more times in both places. With such a short trip, I would probably choose one of them instead of both.
crayon78 is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2011, 02:35 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forgot to mention - we also spent 1.5 days in Brussels on that trip. We thought a couple of days in Brussels was enough, but it depends on your interests.
crayon78 is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2011, 04:43 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 26,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We spent 5 days in Amsterdam and surrounds, 2 nights in Rotterdam. 2 days in Brugges, we made a day trip out of Brugges, 1 day in Brussels.
LSky is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2011, 05:21 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,269
Received 33 Likes on 2 Posts
I'd give Brussels the least amount of time. Brugge is worth 2 days (no major sights, but very cute/quaint - could be done in a full day); Amsterdam is worth 3. I'd stay in Amsterdam and Brugge and get off the train in Brussels for a few hours. Just my opinion.
althom1122 is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2011, 05:41 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 26,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It really depends upon what you want to see in Brussels. The museums like the Magritte Museum, Royal Fine Art and the Horta (which we missed . I love the Art Nouveau buildings and accents. I would have like to stayed an extra day, plus I just liked Brussels.

I don't mind a sleepy little town for a little rest but not for too long.
LSky is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2011, 07:40 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 15,767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't have much time..
If you are not interested in museums in Brussels, you could see the city sights in a day.
Although Brugges is lovely (also small and often very crowded), I would spend more time in Amsterdam .
danon is online now  
Old Apr 4th, 2011, 09:15 PM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with Danon about Amsterdam relative to Brugge and a quick look at Brussels.

BTW, spent two nights in Brugge (the natives prefer the Dutch/ Flemish Brugge - roughly 'Brrew-her') the weekend before last with the day in between partly taken up by a train trip (cheap weekend return fare 4,20 euros) to Knokke on the coast and tram (all day anywhere along the coast ticket 6 euros) to De Haan about half way to France (interesting to see how the locals have their holidays by the sea, but not particularly 'scenic'). That still left enough time to see quite a bit of Brugge old town (but not museums), especially late afternoon/ evening after the day tripping tourists had left. Fairly crowded, but not uncomfortably so during the day I thought, but if it is like that in late March I wouldn't even contemplate going in the high season. The problem is exacerbated by the extremely narrow footpaths and IMO surprisingly irresponsible speed of some vehicles (for all I know there may be more pedestrians-only zones in the high season and the local vehicles may have been having a final hit out).

FWIW was very pleased with my accommodation in Brussels and Brugge, Scandic Grand Place Hotel and Hotel Loreto respectively.
farrermog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Enroh
Europe
5
Jan 28th, 2011 04:56 PM
Champ3331
Europe
0
Mar 19th, 2008 01:38 PM
tribi
Europe
21
Jul 22nd, 2006 06:50 AM
reddattitude
Europe
19
May 11th, 2004 04:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -