Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Amsterdam's Stedelijk 'Bath Tub" Addition Panned...

Amsterdam's Stedelijk 'Bath Tub" Addition Panned...

Old Dec 26th, 2012, 06:45 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amsterdam's Stedelijk 'Bath Tub" Addition Panned...

in this NYTimes article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/24/ar...seum.html?_r=0

The author is pretty hard on Amsterdam officials and Museum Plein, on which it sits - especially excoriating the supermarket built next to it - a bogus charge IMO since the supermarket is underground - he just laments its above ground entrance - I think Amsterdam is right in making such things as supermarkets available to its residents and this was one of the few areas a large new one could be built in the city centre.

I think the writer suffers from a serious case of snob nose-in-the-air attitude I all too often find in art critics - missing the whole picture to give his witty take on things and how they should have been.

I also applaud Amsterdam officials for OKing such a monstrous to some addition to a world-famous museum.

Unlike Venice for example Amsterdam in recent years has shown it is a real city and modern protrusions that such boorish art critics may lampoon signify just that..

Vive Amsterdam!

Anyone have an opinion on the new Modern Art Museum (Stedelijk) addition?
PalenQ is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2012, 09:26 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The addition has a certain "look-at-me aspect" that suggests a lack of concern for its surroundings; was the intent to exteriorize the Dada elements of the Stedelijk's collection?
Michael is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2012, 10:18 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't access that article without logging in unfortunately. I won't bother with that since there are plenty of other news sources that don't require that the reader creates an account just to read an article.

But the new wing does look like a giant bathtub. Not sure whether I like it or not, but in any event, the Albert Heijn supermarket was there before the new wing was built. Also, there's that concrete grass covered slope between the museum and the supermarket which, like you say, is underground.

I've lived in Amsterdam for around 25 years now, but I can't say I'm particularly enamoured by modern Dutch architecture. Most of it is downright ugly IMHO. I just love the old city and its quaint houses some of which look like they're about to topple into the canal.
Xircal is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2012, 11:58 AM
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had no trouble logging in by clicking on the link? Perplexed as I have no account? Curious.
PalenQ is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2012, 01:40 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is really ugly, but it's what is in a museum that matters isn't it?

The simple fact the author calls it Museum Plaza says enough about him. Why not use it's correct name? I'm sure most new Yorkers can understand Museumplein.

As for the Van Gogh extension - it works, and works well. I don't give a fig about how it looks.

A city cannot become a massive museum, no matter how ugly the new architecture is considered now. Over 50 years it may be regarded as an icon.
hetismij2 is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2012, 01:52 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is really ugly, but it's what is in a museum that matters isn't it?

But why have an ugly building, just so the architect can say "look at me!"?
Michael is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2012, 02:03 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 49,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>

Agree. The Tour Eiffel was slated to be razed. The Pyramide du Louvre was considered an abomination. So were the sculptures in the Place des Vosges. Folks said the Centre Pompidou was not only hideous, but a fake (with regard to the pipes and all on the outside), and that it would never last. People decried the Vietnam Memorial here in DC. They're all pretty much considered welcome contributions to history and art now.

Which isn't to say artists and architects don't make gross mistakes, sometimes. Museum Plaza (and I agree - what's he trying to achieve by calling it that?) seems pretty grotesque to me, but Amsterdam has always been a rather edgy art city, at least since I've been going there, so it doesn't seem terribly out of place. By the same token, because A'dam has a long and varied history of art, if the guy and his work turn out to be nothing more than an ego trip, citizens and visitors will be sure to let him know over time.
StCirq is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2012, 02:21 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen some of the new buildings in A'dam (we were there at the end of October) and like a lot of them that we saw out around the port. They were interesting and refreshing. Sorry I can't post photos of them. But this thing, IMO, is awful. There is such a thing as context, plus something called restraint, and I think both were violated in this instance. Plus, no matter where it would be, I think it is a terrible design.
charnees is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2012, 02:26 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 49,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I totally agree, charnees, but I also think that my single opinion isn't particularly relevant when it comes to art and architecture anywhere. As I mentioned, the public will form some sort of consensus over time, and he'll either be ridiculed (as I believe he should be), or some level of acceptance will be achieved. Or the tub will be emptied and the faucets turned off.
StCirq is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2012, 04:38 PM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is worse than the relative merit of the architecture is the fact that the Stedelijk has lost its stature as a top modern art museum. I think the article points that out too and I think it's a shame and a shambles, because the whole preposterous closure of the Stedelijk came about because political machinations. The entire re design of the Museumplein has failed from the grass not taking root to the skatepark being so dangerous that it can't be skated. Even the situation with the high way through it was better than this. And that the Stedelijk should have turned its back on Paulus Potterstraat is equally awful. I'm glad it's open again, but it's now a provincial "me too" museum instead of the modern art hotspot it once was.
menachem is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dayle
Europe
16
Jan 10th, 2017 12:14 PM
Laurelle
Europe
19
Aug 21st, 2016 12:59 PM
hetismij
Europe
8
Feb 27th, 2010 09:53 AM
BKP
Europe
5
Apr 24th, 2009 04:56 PM
kmrg2000
Europe
7
Mar 26th, 2009 11:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -