Cruises Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

View all Cruises activity »
  1. 1 My first river cruise 12-2017
  2. 2 Trip Report Alaska Shore excursion on the cheap
  3. 3 Trip Report Viking Review - Dont Buy the Hype
  4. 4 Glacier Bay or Hubbard Glacier
  5. 5 Tauck Small Ship Cruise to Portugal and Spain
  6. 6 Cunard vs. Oceania
  7. 7 Barcelona: Pier to Airport Transfer
  8. 8 Trip Report Avoid MSC; Worst vacation ever!
  9. 9 Crazy cruise complaints.
  10. 10 Repositioning Cruise
  11. 11 Trip Report Viking handles Elbe low water badly
  12. 12 HAL Koningsdam anyone recently?
  13. 13 Quebec,Nivea Sofia,new Foundland cries?
  14. 14 Regent Seven Seas Explorer - anyone been?
  15. 15 Trip Report Jazz Cruise 2017
  16. 16 Kudos to Royal Caribbean and SW airlines
  17. 17 Trip Report We're “Country Cruising”.. And Lovin It!
  18. 18 Booking a return flight before noon?
  19. 19 from civitavecchia port to city of Rome
  20. 20 Considering a Tauck river cruise
  21. 21 HAL - "Open Seating Notification"
  22. 22 Azamara OR Oceania...Rome to Venice
  23. 23 Perks for owning shares to cruise lines
  24. 24 Viking Homelands cruise of Baltic
  25. 25 Trip Report Trip report. Our cruise on the Diamond Princess with a stay in Tokyo
View next 25 » Back to the top

Trip Report Antarctica Cruise Review w Lindblad Nov. 2009

Jump to last reply

In November 2009, we went on a Lindblad-National Geographic Cruise in Antarctica on the National Geographic Explorer. The expedition operations (site selection, Zodiacing, hiking, kayaking, etc.) were spectacular. We never felt rushed and everything was professionally run. There were usually 2 landings a day, weather permitting. One day the Captain drove up onto the ice so we could take a walk on ice. He also made a stop so we could swim along a thermally heated shoreline. Regardless of where we were, the mountains, ice flows, and sunsets were always incredible. We saw tens of thousands of penguins, many other types of birds, seals, and whales. Oftentimes the penguins would walk to within a foot or so of us. The enormity of it all has to be experienced, it can’t be described.

We had equally high hopes for the educational activities, given National Geographic’s preeminence in nature education and the alliance formed in 2004 between National Geographic and Lindblad. We were surprised there was no use of any National Geographic materials in presentations. The one short film we were shown appeared to be a BBC production. Our official National Geographic photographer gave two presentations. One was about shooting a small wedding service in Alaska?! There was no channel on the in-room TV with National Geographic films and no DVD players to play any Nat Geo DVDs bought in a gift shop.

Most days there were one or two talks given by one of the many naturalists. The individual talks were interesting, but they paled in comparison to the quality of the presentations Regent Cruise lines provided on our Alaska cruise. It appeared we had a collection of talented, knowledgeable, motivated naturalists with no one in charge. Note this is not the presenters’ fault – it’s a management problem. The presenters and naturalists were as enthusiastic, helpful, and fired up as any group of workers we’ve ever seen. They just need direction, access to Nat Geo materials, and help with presentations.

The dining experience was mediocre. Among menu selection, food quality, food preparation, buffet replenishment, and service, two of the five were usually bad, two OK, and one good to very good. Ordering off menu was “tolerated”. Language barriers appeared out of nowhere when we tried to order things as simple as a grilled cheese sandwich. It seemed odd there wasn't a lobster or crab night. Fresh crab appeared to be the local specialty at Ushuaia, our departure point. On the plus side, the selection of moderately priced wines was quite good and many were available by the glass. (Note our food experience may be a fluke. One of the guests had been on many Lindblad expeditions before and said the food operation on this one was “just bad”.)

We were surprised there were basically no organized social activities at all beyond morning stretches and a recap of the day’s events before dinner. After dinner one could work out, visit the lounge, or watch the one movie that ran repeatedly (but was changed each day). Some attempt to break up the sameness over the 10 days at sea would have been much appreciated, especially after dinner.

Our cabin was nicely laid out and reasonable for the price. We always had lots of hot water, but heard from numerous folks on the 3rd deck they had problems throughout the cruise.

In summary - not a good value for us and our last Lindblad National Geographic Cruise. If expedition operations are far more important than everything else to you, this trip is worth considering.

16 Replies |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement