Air Travel Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

View all Air Travel activity »
  1. 1 Cheap flights to Europe from Pittsburg
  2. 2 Consolidators for Biz Class - has any one used one?
  3. 3 BA not to fly to serve anymore.
  4. 4 Medication Sleep Aid for 30+ Hours Travel
  5. 5 How to figure out the cost of a trip when purchasing insurance.
  6. 6 Airtreks and Bootsnall
  7. 7 Miami International Airport
  8. 8 Trip Report T4 (AA) remodel at LAX
  9. 9 What should I know about flying Southwest?
  10. 10 Complimentary upgrades on Delta with companion
  11. 11 Question on checkin for international
  12. 12 travelling with ensure
  13. 13 Connection time
  14. 14 Flight from Athens to Santorini?
  15. 15 Connecting in Toronto for return to US
  16. 16 Award travel and fees
  17. 17 Arlanda connecting flight Intl to oslo Customs??
  18. 18 PHL layover
  19. 19 Is there a best day to book an international flight? a best day to fly?
  20. 20 searching for flights on Kayak
  21. 21 PHL-CDG airline change with checked bags (less than 2 hrs) HELP!!!
  22. 22 U.K. Registered Traveler vs Fast Track
  23. 23 Booking with airline vs. Orbitz or Priceline
  24. 24 Which site to use (or not) to book airfare
  25. 25 Purchasing third coach seat for two passengers on international flight
View next 25 » Back to the top

TSA Eliminates Backscatter X-Ray Nude Body Scanners

Jump to last reply

More good news:

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/tsa-abandons-nude-scanners/

Unfortunately, they are getting rid of only the backscatter x-ray machines, sold by Rapiscan, but not the millimeter-wave body scanners. So, we're still saddled with slow, highly expensive, and not very effective technology (*). But the good news is that X-rays are known to be dangerous; the only scientific debate is how safe the possible exposure levels are (**). So, it's good to get rid of those. Millimeter waves have not been well studied, but at least we don't know of any reason why they'd be dangerous.

The decision is apparently due not to abstract scientific safety concerns, or cost effectiveness, but because Rapiscan couldn't get their software right in time to do the automated target recognition. So, this is a win for privacy, as only a computer will see the "nude" images. I'm sure politics had nothing to do with this at all. (***)

(*) The whole "enhanced imaging device" nude scanner thing was driven by the Underwear Bomber, but the scary thing is that al Qaeda has already used a rectum bomb in an assassination attempt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Hassan_Al_Aseery

(**) With a properly functioning and calibrated scanner, assuming the X-rays are absorbed uniformly by the body, the dosage level is tiny and poses extremely low risk. The concerns are that the backscatter X-ray frequencies tend to be absorbed concentrated in and near the skin, increasing the dose; that the machines might not always be maintained or calibrated properly (and TSA forbids agents from wearing radiation badges, reducing safety in an effort to make people feel safe); and that the software controlling the scanning might fail, resulting in a concentrated X-ray dosage.

(***) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html

2 Replies |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement