Air Travel Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

View all Air Travel activity »
  1. 1 SFO runway closures ?
  2. 2 Trip Report Excellent Experience on Singapore Airlines Long Haul cattle class
  3. 3 AA from PHL to LIH for Seniors
  4. 4 Help!
  5. 5 Amaszonas Airlines
  6. 6 El Salvador plane change
  7. 7 A horror story about Justfly
  8. 8 Would you rather...KEF vs ARN Layover
  9. 9 You gotta love Southwest
  10. 10 Vancouver Ariport lounges?
  11. 11 Picking a seat on Virgin
  12. 12 Condor phone number???
  13. 13 Condor flight check-in, seat selection, bag check, etc help?
  14. 14 Connection time
  15. 15 Anyone need round trip tickets to France / Barcelona
  16. 16 Priceline BA Flight on AA Codeshare Questions
  17. 17 Carry on
  18. 18 Upgraded; will it stick?
  19. 19 LAX Terminal Reshuffle
  20. 20 When can the pilot turn off the fasten seatbelt sign
  21. 21 International trip to Zurich, in parts...?
  22. 22 First time to Italy
  23. 23 Departing FCO
  24. 24 Car seat harassment
  25. 25 Air Canada rouge or air transat?
View next 25 » Back to the top

TSA Eliminates Backscatter X-Ray Nude Body Scanners

Jump to last reply

More good news:

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/tsa-abandons-nude-scanners/

Unfortunately, they are getting rid of only the backscatter x-ray machines, sold by Rapiscan, but not the millimeter-wave body scanners. So, we're still saddled with slow, highly expensive, and not very effective technology (*). But the good news is that X-rays are known to be dangerous; the only scientific debate is how safe the possible exposure levels are (**). So, it's good to get rid of those. Millimeter waves have not been well studied, but at least we don't know of any reason why they'd be dangerous.

The decision is apparently due not to abstract scientific safety concerns, or cost effectiveness, but because Rapiscan couldn't get their software right in time to do the automated target recognition. So, this is a win for privacy, as only a computer will see the "nude" images. I'm sure politics had nothing to do with this at all. (***)

(*) The whole "enhanced imaging device" nude scanner thing was driven by the Underwear Bomber, but the scary thing is that al Qaeda has already used a rectum bomb in an assassination attempt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Hassan_Al_Aseery

(**) With a properly functioning and calibrated scanner, assuming the X-rays are absorbed uniformly by the body, the dosage level is tiny and poses extremely low risk. The concerns are that the backscatter X-ray frequencies tend to be absorbed concentrated in and near the skin, increasing the dose; that the machines might not always be maintained or calibrated properly (and TSA forbids agents from wearing radiation badges, reducing safety in an effort to make people feel safe); and that the software controlling the scanning might fail, resulting in a concentrated X-ray dosage.

(***) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html

2 Replies |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement