Air Travel Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

View all Air Travel activity »
  1. 1 KLM refund process - not good!
  2. 2 Houston Airport - United Airlines
  3. 3 Beach Ball headrest?
  4. 4 Booking SNAFU with Qatar Airways
  5. 5 Avoid Alpha Flight Guru or be stranded somewhere and pay the price!
  6. 6 Arr Stansted; Dep LHR, one night in London: where?
  7. 7 Anyone tried Turkish Airlines for long flights before?
  8. 8 How does luggage go to the wrong place?
  9. 9 small claims court for travel website (orbitz)
  10. 10 Turkish Airlines - Leg disappeared
  11. 11 I hour connection Heathrow
  12. 12 AA seat assignments
  13. 13 AA Business Class on 777
  14. 14 Saga Class on Icelandair
  15. 15 Bravofly Legal Actions
  16. 16 Tipping Flight Attendants??? Is this the new norm?
  17. 17 SkyLux - Anyone have Feedback??
  18. 18 Rome To Sardinia
  19. 19 Do I have time to recheck bags in Athens and make my flight
  20. 20 Has anyone heard of Dealber?
  21. 21 Baggage Checked-through on Non-* Alliance?
  22. 22 name on ticket and passport
  23. 23 Best Multi-City Booking Site?
  24. 24 Changing flights in LAX from international to Domestic
  25. 25 Aer Lingus DC-Dublin?
View next 25 » Back to the top

TSA Eliminates Backscatter X-Ray Nude Body Scanners

Jump to last reply

More good news:

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/tsa-abandons-nude-scanners/

Unfortunately, they are getting rid of only the backscatter x-ray machines, sold by Rapiscan, but not the millimeter-wave body scanners. So, we're still saddled with slow, highly expensive, and not very effective technology (*). But the good news is that X-rays are known to be dangerous; the only scientific debate is how safe the possible exposure levels are (**). So, it's good to get rid of those. Millimeter waves have not been well studied, but at least we don't know of any reason why they'd be dangerous.

The decision is apparently due not to abstract scientific safety concerns, or cost effectiveness, but because Rapiscan couldn't get their software right in time to do the automated target recognition. So, this is a win for privacy, as only a computer will see the "nude" images. I'm sure politics had nothing to do with this at all. (***)

(*) The whole "enhanced imaging device" nude scanner thing was driven by the Underwear Bomber, but the scary thing is that al Qaeda has already used a rectum bomb in an assassination attempt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Hassan_Al_Aseery

(**) With a properly functioning and calibrated scanner, assuming the X-rays are absorbed uniformly by the body, the dosage level is tiny and poses extremely low risk. The concerns are that the backscatter X-ray frequencies tend to be absorbed concentrated in and near the skin, increasing the dose; that the machines might not always be maintained or calibrated properly (and TSA forbids agents from wearing radiation badges, reducing safety in an effort to make people feel safe); and that the software controlling the scanning might fail, resulting in a concentrated X-ray dosage.

(***) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html

2 Replies |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement