Air Travel Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

View all Air Travel activity »
  1. 1 Tipping for Wheelchair Assistance
  2. 2 Toronto-Atlanta-Fort Walton Beach
  3. 3 Norwegian Airlines through Expedia
  4. 4 Global Entry advice
  5. 5 Discount Airlines Ok?
  6. 6 TXL or FRA?
  7. 7 Does a OneWorld Explorer ticket make sense?
  8. 8 Fly Royal Jordanian BKK to HKG?
  9. 9 The Big Black X at U.S. Immigration
  10. 10 Please tell me about RyanAir and EasyJet
  11. 11 Overnight Layover at LaGuardia
  12. 12 Trip Report Istanbul Airport is Horrible
  13. 13 Need Advice about Ticket Price Drop
  14. 14 Thomas Cook Airlines PREMIUM ECONOMY from JFK-MAN return - WORTH IT?
  15. 15 Beach Ball headrest?
  16. 16 compensation for loosing a bag
  17. 17 Cancelling an AA miles ticket
  18. 18 RTW Routing Guidance
  19. 19 JFK or EWR?
  20. 20 Transit time at Narita, Tokyo. Is 1h 5m do-able?
  21. 21 Best Premium Economy to Copenhagen from DTW
  22. 22 Virgin Vs. Delta BOS-LHR
  23. 23 Gifting AA miles
  24. 24 How do I book AA award flights using two different account numbers?
  25. 25 WOW paying for an assigned seat!
View next 25 » Back to the top

TSA Eliminates Backscatter X-Ray Nude Body Scanners

Jump to last reply

More good news:

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/tsa-abandons-nude-scanners/

Unfortunately, they are getting rid of only the backscatter x-ray machines, sold by Rapiscan, but not the millimeter-wave body scanners. So, we're still saddled with slow, highly expensive, and not very effective technology (*). But the good news is that X-rays are known to be dangerous; the only scientific debate is how safe the possible exposure levels are (**). So, it's good to get rid of those. Millimeter waves have not been well studied, but at least we don't know of any reason why they'd be dangerous.

The decision is apparently due not to abstract scientific safety concerns, or cost effectiveness, but because Rapiscan couldn't get their software right in time to do the automated target recognition. So, this is a win for privacy, as only a computer will see the "nude" images. I'm sure politics had nothing to do with this at all. (***)

(*) The whole "enhanced imaging device" nude scanner thing was driven by the Underwear Bomber, but the scary thing is that al Qaeda has already used a rectum bomb in an assassination attempt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Hassan_Al_Aseery

(**) With a properly functioning and calibrated scanner, assuming the X-rays are absorbed uniformly by the body, the dosage level is tiny and poses extremely low risk. The concerns are that the backscatter X-ray frequencies tend to be absorbed concentrated in and near the skin, increasing the dose; that the machines might not always be maintained or calibrated properly (and TSA forbids agents from wearing radiation badges, reducing safety in an effort to make people feel safe); and that the software controlling the scanning might fail, resulting in a concentrated X-ray dosage.

(***) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html

2 Replies |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement