Air Travel Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

View all Air Travel activity »
  1. 1 http://dietplanusa.com/alpha-levo-energize/
  2. 2 Separate tickets with only carry ons -- do I have to go through customs?
  3. 3 Check your electronics or fly American
  4. 4 Priority Pass - Worth It?
  5. 5 Sea-Tac Virgin Atlantic flight
  6. 6 Flying through Casablanca
  7. 7 How to book YYZ-ZRH-NBO-YYZ ?
  8. 8 what if connecting flight cancels
  9. 9 enough time for this flight?
  10. 10 Qantas FF access to Emirates lounge CDG?
  11. 11 aRound-The-World for less than $/€ 1,200
  12. 12 EasyJet
  13. 13 TSA OR Global Entry
  14. 14 How to figure out the cost of a trip when purchasing insurance.
  15. 15 "This route is pending regulatory approval."
  16. 16 Medication Sleep Aid for 30+ Hours Travel
  17. 17 U.K. Registered Traveler vs Fast Track
  18. 18 How do you get from terminal 8 to terminal 2 at JFK airport?
  19. 19 Amsterdam flight change
  20. 20 AA FF flights
  21. 21 Consolidators for Biz Class - has any one used one?
  22. 22 Delta/Virgin Atlantic carryon sizes
  23. 23 Ways to stay entertained at Toronto Airport
  24. 24 Compensation after engine fire, 2 day delay
  25. 25 Europe's LCC routes - lots of changes!
View next 25 » Back to the top

TSA Eliminates Backscatter X-Ray Nude Body Scanners

Jump to last reply

More good news:

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/tsa-abandons-nude-scanners/

Unfortunately, they are getting rid of only the backscatter x-ray machines, sold by Rapiscan, but not the millimeter-wave body scanners. So, we're still saddled with slow, highly expensive, and not very effective technology (*). But the good news is that X-rays are known to be dangerous; the only scientific debate is how safe the possible exposure levels are (**). So, it's good to get rid of those. Millimeter waves have not been well studied, but at least we don't know of any reason why they'd be dangerous.

The decision is apparently due not to abstract scientific safety concerns, or cost effectiveness, but because Rapiscan couldn't get their software right in time to do the automated target recognition. So, this is a win for privacy, as only a computer will see the "nude" images. I'm sure politics had nothing to do with this at all. (***)

(*) The whole "enhanced imaging device" nude scanner thing was driven by the Underwear Bomber, but the scary thing is that al Qaeda has already used a rectum bomb in an assassination attempt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Hassan_Al_Aseery

(**) With a properly functioning and calibrated scanner, assuming the X-rays are absorbed uniformly by the body, the dosage level is tiny and poses extremely low risk. The concerns are that the backscatter X-ray frequencies tend to be absorbed concentrated in and near the skin, increasing the dose; that the machines might not always be maintained or calibrated properly (and TSA forbids agents from wearing radiation badges, reducing safety in an effort to make people feel safe); and that the software controlling the scanning might fail, resulting in a concentrated X-ray dosage.

(***) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html

2 Replies |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement