Air Travel Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

View all Air Travel activity »
  1. 1 How much time do I need to switch planes in CDG
  2. 2 Shopping duty Free On Board versus On Ground
  3. 3 Travel with iPad on International Flight
  4. 4 1st RTW- cheapest place to start?
  5. 5 Newark Terminal Transfer
  6. 6 Best time to buy tix on Southwest
  7. 7 Redeeming Miles with a Capital One Card
  8. 8 Free Stopovers in Europe, flying from NYC?
  9. 9 Best/worst airlines for traveling with pets?
  10. 10 Porter or Air Canada?
  11. 11 Going through security with herbs?
  12. 12 Help me get award tickets using variety of points
  13. 13 Foot Rests? China Airlines Premium Economy Experiences ??
  14. 14 Chocolates in carry on allowed?
  15. 15 Is it safe to put a laptop in a carry on suitcase?
  16. 16 Booking with airline vs. Orbitz or Priceline
  17. 17 What can be done if one date is wrong?
  18. 18 West Coast USA>France routes
  19. 19 United and ANA
  20. 20 Trip Report Excellent Experience on Singapore Airlines Long Haul cattle class
  21. 21 Domestic to Int'l at JFK
  22. 22 Help!
  23. 23 Scandanivian Airlines
  24. 24 Airtreks and Bootsnall
View next 25 » Back to the top

TSA Eliminates Backscatter X-Ray Nude Body Scanners

Jump to last reply

More good news:

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/tsa-abandons-nude-scanners/

Unfortunately, they are getting rid of only the backscatter x-ray machines, sold by Rapiscan, but not the millimeter-wave body scanners. So, we're still saddled with slow, highly expensive, and not very effective technology (*). But the good news is that X-rays are known to be dangerous; the only scientific debate is how safe the possible exposure levels are (**). So, it's good to get rid of those. Millimeter waves have not been well studied, but at least we don't know of any reason why they'd be dangerous.

The decision is apparently due not to abstract scientific safety concerns, or cost effectiveness, but because Rapiscan couldn't get their software right in time to do the automated target recognition. So, this is a win for privacy, as only a computer will see the "nude" images. I'm sure politics had nothing to do with this at all. (***)

(*) The whole "enhanced imaging device" nude scanner thing was driven by the Underwear Bomber, but the scary thing is that al Qaeda has already used a rectum bomb in an assassination attempt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Hassan_Al_Aseery

(**) With a properly functioning and calibrated scanner, assuming the X-rays are absorbed uniformly by the body, the dosage level is tiny and poses extremely low risk. The concerns are that the backscatter X-ray frequencies tend to be absorbed concentrated in and near the skin, increasing the dose; that the machines might not always be maintained or calibrated properly (and TSA forbids agents from wearing radiation badges, reducing safety in an effort to make people feel safe); and that the software controlling the scanning might fail, resulting in a concentrated X-ray dosage.

(***) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html

2 Replies |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement