Air Travel Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

  • How do you plan your trips?
  • Please help us learn by participating in a brief survey.
View all Air Travel activity »
  1. 1 http://healthonlinereviews.com/defi-collagen-serum/
  2. 2 Car seat harassment
  3. 3 Saga Class on Icelandair
  4. 4 JAL or AA business--LAX to TKO
  5. 5 Checked Luggage on Separate Tickets
  6. 6 Short Layover (1 hour) in Seattle/Tacoma?
  7. 7 International arrival - easiest airport for connection?
  8. 8 Carry on
  9. 9 LAX Terminal Reshuffle
  10. 10 WestJet to add budget line
  11. 11 JetBlue Hub in Fort Lauderdale
  12. 12 gate distance
  13. 13 When can the pilot turn off the fasten seatbelt sign
  14. 14 Luggage Newark - Houston - Belize and back
  15. 15 Luggage tag
  16. 16 Premium Economy - Air France vs Lufthansa
  17. 17 Departing FCO
  18. 18 carryon fee on international flights?
  19. 19 Incomplete first name on international ticket
  20. 20 FCO - CDG - SFO connection
  21. 21 Medication Sleep Aid for 30+ Hours Travel
  22. 22 Changing terminals in Philadelphia
  23. 23 AirAsia not accepting payment
  24. 24 enough time for this flight?
  25. 25 live in Seattle and dreaming of London? Norwegian arrives Sept!
View next 25 » Back to the top

TSA Eliminates Backscatter X-Ray Nude Body Scanners

Jump to last reply

More good news:

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/tsa-abandons-nude-scanners/

Unfortunately, they are getting rid of only the backscatter x-ray machines, sold by Rapiscan, but not the millimeter-wave body scanners. So, we're still saddled with slow, highly expensive, and not very effective technology (*). But the good news is that X-rays are known to be dangerous; the only scientific debate is how safe the possible exposure levels are (**). So, it's good to get rid of those. Millimeter waves have not been well studied, but at least we don't know of any reason why they'd be dangerous.

The decision is apparently due not to abstract scientific safety concerns, or cost effectiveness, but because Rapiscan couldn't get their software right in time to do the automated target recognition. So, this is a win for privacy, as only a computer will see the "nude" images. I'm sure politics had nothing to do with this at all. (***)

(*) The whole "enhanced imaging device" nude scanner thing was driven by the Underwear Bomber, but the scary thing is that al Qaeda has already used a rectum bomb in an assassination attempt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Hassan_Al_Aseery

(**) With a properly functioning and calibrated scanner, assuming the X-rays are absorbed uniformly by the body, the dosage level is tiny and poses extremely low risk. The concerns are that the backscatter X-ray frequencies tend to be absorbed concentrated in and near the skin, increasing the dose; that the machines might not always be maintained or calibrated properly (and TSA forbids agents from wearing radiation badges, reducing safety in an effort to make people feel safe); and that the software controlling the scanning might fail, resulting in a concentrated X-ray dosage.

(***) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html

2 Replies |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement