Air Travel Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

View all Air Travel activity »
  1. 1 Airport Controlled Seats INTERNATIONAL
  2. 2 Some Q's about Rome airport
  3. 3 EUROPE FLIGHT
  4. 4 Bravofly Legal Actions
  5. 5 Southwest "no-change-fee" - really?
  6. 6 Kenya Airways/Skyteam questions.
  7. 7 Amex points to Paris/ Italy in 1st
  8. 8 Aegean Airlines Carry on Allowance
  9. 9 Does a OneWorld Explorer ticket make sense?
  10. 10 Anyone used webjet.com?
  11. 11 Abu Dhabi transit with separate tickets
  12. 12 Websites Which Show Flights with Flatbed Seats??
  13. 13 Overseas Flights with Different Airlines
  14. 14 Wheelchair Assistance
  15. 15 Ever cancel tickets on American?
  16. 16 Unaccompanied minor
  17. 17 Beach Ball headrest?
  18. 18 Southwest Airlines pricing?
  19. 19 Late flight from Miami Intl Airport
  20. 20 Air France from SFO to Madrid
  21. 21 JetBlue flight cancellation - nice job
  22. 22 Booking via Air India - help asap
  23. 23 Turkish Airlines Awful
  24. 24 AA to award points according to $ spent not miles
  25. 25 Booking flights
View next 25 » Back to the top

TSA Eliminates Backscatter X-Ray Nude Body Scanners

Jump to last reply

More good news:

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/tsa-abandons-nude-scanners/

Unfortunately, they are getting rid of only the backscatter x-ray machines, sold by Rapiscan, but not the millimeter-wave body scanners. So, we're still saddled with slow, highly expensive, and not very effective technology (*). But the good news is that X-rays are known to be dangerous; the only scientific debate is how safe the possible exposure levels are (**). So, it's good to get rid of those. Millimeter waves have not been well studied, but at least we don't know of any reason why they'd be dangerous.

The decision is apparently due not to abstract scientific safety concerns, or cost effectiveness, but because Rapiscan couldn't get their software right in time to do the automated target recognition. So, this is a win for privacy, as only a computer will see the "nude" images. I'm sure politics had nothing to do with this at all. (***)

(*) The whole "enhanced imaging device" nude scanner thing was driven by the Underwear Bomber, but the scary thing is that al Qaeda has already used a rectum bomb in an assassination attempt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Hassan_Al_Aseery

(**) With a properly functioning and calibrated scanner, assuming the X-rays are absorbed uniformly by the body, the dosage level is tiny and poses extremely low risk. The concerns are that the backscatter X-ray frequencies tend to be absorbed concentrated in and near the skin, increasing the dose; that the machines might not always be maintained or calibrated properly (and TSA forbids agents from wearing radiation badges, reducing safety in an effort to make people feel safe); and that the software controlling the scanning might fail, resulting in a concentrated X-ray dosage.

(***) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html

2 Replies |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement