Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Travel Topics > Air Travel
Reload this Page >

First time on 787 Dreamliner - great, mostly!

Search

First time on 787 Dreamliner - great, mostly!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1st, 2014, 04:20 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First time on 787 Dreamliner - great, mostly!

Had my first flight on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner last week, Houston to London on United. Publicity materials pointed out that because the plane is made of composite material rather than metal, they are able to maintain a higher cabin humidity and pressurize to a lower level, both of which reduce the flight related stress on the body. Lo and behold, I found that to be true - less jet lag! The flight attendants I asked said the same thing - they like working the 787 for that reason.

Overhead bins were pretty large, easily held several rollaboards. Windows were much larger than usual, and instead of shades were electronically dimmed / lightened. This made for some great views. The "mood lighting" throughout the cabin was unobtrusive, consisting of indirect light at the ceiling level in colors that were changed at different times to (allegedly) help with circadian rhythm.

Now, the seats - though the posted pitch is 35" in E+/ 32" in regular Economy, felt like the seats were a bit cramped. I was in the bulkhead seat just behind the BusinessFirst cabin so had plenty of leg room, but the other seats seemed pretty close together. Not as bad as on the American 777 we flew last year, but still a bit more cramped than I expected. And the width is down to 17.3", so a bit less than on other long range craft.

Overall, loved it and will definitely try to arrange future itineraries to use the 787 if possible.
Seamus is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2014, 03:36 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 36,792
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
You are lucky you got your flight in when you did. The morning news says all 787's are now grounded due to a battery fire from a design flaw.
kybourbon is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2014, 06:37 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
kybourbon, you are 100% wrong, unless you meant that "the morning news" was the morning news from a year ago.
DonTopaz is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2014, 08:38 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 36,792
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
No, it was on the national news last night and again this morning - showing pics of the burned batteries. I admit I didn't listen to every detail (always multi-tasking), but they were talking about the planes being grounded and the battery fires.
kybourbon is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2014, 08:47 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let me clear up the confusion. The issue WAS nearly a year ago and planes were grounded for months. But yesterday the National Transportation and Safety board released their final report about the incident. That's why it was in the news -- not that they've been grounded again.
NeoPatrick is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2014, 02:13 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,855
Received 83 Likes on 5 Posts
Big sigh of relief...we just booked flights from Perth to Auckland and return on the 787 in Premium Economy a few days ago.

I've only flown the Dreamliner once so far, from Auckland to Perth a few months back, and it was pretty incredible (also in Premium Economy).
Melnq8 is online now  
Old Dec 2nd, 2014, 05:20 PM
  #7  
P_M
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 25,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the review Seamus. I am booked on the 787 from LHR to AUS next year. I am looking forward to it.
P_M is online now  
Old Dec 3rd, 2014, 05:34 AM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying Houston to Frankfurt (Coach) on Dreamliner in March and looking forward to it!! Thanks for the review.
JaneB is offline  
Old Dec 3rd, 2014, 12:53 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 36,792
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
>>>But yesterday the National Transportation and Safety board released their final report about the incident. That's why it was in the news -- not that they've been grounded again.<<<

Thanks, Neo!
kybourbon is offline  
Old Dec 29th, 2014, 12:34 AM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I flew the Dreamliner in economy my shoulder rubbed the person next to me for the entire flight. Every time the flight attendant walk down the aisle she bumped my seat. Also, whenever the fasten seatbelt sign came on there was a very loud recorded message that said "ladies and gentlemen the captain has turned on the fasten seatbelt sign please make sure your seatbelt is fastened at this time." Bring some good earphones.

In short, I would take a 777 with nine across or an A330 if I had a long flight. The isles are very narrow on the 787.
wally34949 is offline  
Old Dec 29th, 2014, 04:06 AM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wally, the problems you had have much more to do with the airline and not the airplane model.

United, for example, squeezes 9 seats across in economy (3-3-3) on a 787, while other carriers such as Japan Airlines 8-across (2-4-2). 9-across seating will obviously result in less shoulder room (and probably narrower aisles) than 8-across.
DonTopaz is offline  
Old Dec 30th, 2014, 04:20 AM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I only saw the raw version of the plane. It landed at Daytona and was lucky enough to go on and see the inside. It had sections showing the materials used and the cockpit was still wide open. The Emory Riddle pilots were posing for pics sitting in the Captains seat. I am glad all the flaws have been fixed. It is made in South Carolina and Boeing did that to avoid Unions. Many of the space workers moved there to get jobs and the work conditions are not the best.
flpab is offline  
Old Dec 30th, 2014, 07:50 AM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 72,795
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 7 Posts
wally: as DonTopaz says -- none of your issues have to do w/ the <u>plane</u> but w/ how the specific airline decides to configure it.

Same situations occur on your 'preferred' 777 or A330 when an airline crams more seats into coach.
janisj is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toontowndoc
Mexico & Central America
4
May 31st, 2010 06:12 PM
JamesA
Asia
9
Jan 13th, 2009 03:08 PM
jetset1
United States
51
Jul 1st, 2007 02:04 PM
starrsville
United States
6
Oct 19th, 2006 11:18 AM
fides
Mexico & Central America
4
Jul 21st, 2004 02:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -